Conway
Daily Sun
10/12/2006
CMI's wetlands permit up for grabs at public hearing
Another appeal by Focus:
Tamworth
Nate Giarnese
TAMWORTH
—As racetrack builder Club Motorsports Inc. prepares to appear before
a rapt regional audience here at a key public permit hearing later this
month, its staunchest opponents announced their appeal this week of a
major federal permitting victory earned by the company about a year ago.
The challenge to an already issued U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
water-related permit is the latest in a long running string of court
actions taken by citizen's group Focus:
Tamworth
. The group and its lawyers earlier won a ruling forcing CMI to return
to
Tamworth
for a local wetlands permit. The long-awaited public hearing, once
expected to happen two years ago before CMI pulled its application, is
set for Tuesday, Oct. 17 at 7 p.m. at the
K.A.
Brett
School
.
After making known its displeasure with the Army Corps several months
ago, Focus:Tamworth confirmed this week that it had filed a challenge in
a
Concord
court against the company's hard-won federal environmental permit. Corps
engineers, echoing state wetlands authorities, found the company's plans
to build its mountainside driving track would not ruin wetlands or bring
excessive noise and other environmental degradation.
In a second announcement on the same day, Focus:Tamworth also
declared CMI's newest plans do not meet the rigorous restrictions of
Tamworth's Wetlands Ordinance, and said CMI's latest permit application
should be denied. At the upcoming hearing, local citizens and officials
from area towns will be asked to comment. Minus three members who
recused themselves after CMI accused them of bias, the planning board is
expected to rule on the approval in the following months.
CMI President and CEO Lloyd Dahmen said his company was unfazed by a
recent conservation commission recommendation to reject his application.
The commission has crossed swords with CMI before, as its chairman this
summer rose publicly to defend the ordinance against charges by Dahmen
that it was used selectively to target him.
“It's only advisory,” Dahmen said of the conservation finding.
“We believe we will make our case appropriately before the planning
board.”
Dahmen would not hint at whether CMI would consider breaking ground
while still facing the federal appeal, should the local hearing bring
another permitting victory.
“It will give everybody a chance to get up and speak their
minds,” he said.
Tuesday's hearing promises another standing-room-only crowd and an
outpouring of opinion on the consistently contentious issue. A first
Army Corps permit hearing drew hundreds, with the vast majority
lambasting CMI for tactics many called underhanded.
Focus:
Tamworth
has lobbied for years to force the multi-million-dollar private getaway
for well-heeled drivers and their fast cars to comply with local
regulations. The citizen's group, apparently also well-funded, won a key
legal battle before a judge recently, forcing the public hearing after
CMI backed out of a similar local showing in 2004 at the last minute.
Meanhile, drawing new skirmishes in the slow-plodding legal war, CMI
has earned several critical permits from state and federal authorities.
Focus:
Tamworth
has filed several appeals.
“I would observe that in the past two years Focus:
Tamworth
has filed several lawsuits, we have filed none,” Dahmen said. “We
are trying as best we can to work out these issues with the town.”
But over the course of the long and complex dispute that predates
Dahmen's presidency, CMI has threatened to sue Tamworth at least once,
prompting outrage from many who felt the company sought to subvert the
democratic process.
The local wetlands permit now up for grabs was ruled a regional issue
because of the massive project's potential for wide-ranging impact.
Several
Madison
homeowners on nearby
Silver
Lake
have added their names to the Army Corps appeal because the track faces
their lakefront homes, Focus:
Tamworth
representatives said.
In a second press release challenging the Army Corps permit, Focus:
Tamworth
spokesperson Charles Greenhalgh cited a noisy off-road show near the
site where CMI plans its three-mile asphalt run. Greenhalgh, a local
lawyer, said a slew of complaints over next-door Ossipee's summertime
four-wheel festival “illustrates how objectionable the noise from
recreational motor vehicles can be without significant noise
restrictions.”
A first showcase in August of trucks, ATV's and dirt bikes drew
multiple complaints. But after a second smaller-scale event, organizer
Falcon Extreme Motorsports won accolades from officials and complaining
neighbors for its diligence in controlling noise from booming public
address speakers. Even so, a nearby business wasn't “thrilled” by
the disruptions.
Dahmen said he was at one of the events and that it had little of the
expert engineering he says his track will rely on to cut sound.
It is over noise that Focus:
Tamworth
is challenging the Corps approval. Engineers said they considered a
sweeping array of environmental and human factors. Noise was a key
element, and perhaps the most contentious.
After a round of rigorous sound investigations, Focus:
Tamworth
boldly charged that the Army Corps had ignored its own expert.
Addressing a stalemate between one sound study backed by Focus:Tamworth
and another put forward by CMI, the agency's third-party-contracted
sound engineer James Cowan wrote: “The frequency content and the
duration of noise events that could be caused by this facility will
sound like no other sound sources in the area. Without appropriate
limits, this will change the environment of the
Tamworth
area.”
But when the Army Corps issued the permit with a higher-than-expected
limit, Focus:
Tamworth
demanded an explanation.
“We at least wanted to hear why the Corps chose to ignore the clear
recommendations of its own expert,” Greenhalgh said. “But the Corps
simply reaffirmed its decision and offered no rationale or explanation
for its actions, so we have taken the next step and brought the matter
to U.S. District Court.”
|