|
NEWS
RELEASE -- Focus:
Tamworth
FOR
MORE INFORMATION:
Kate
Vachon, press coordinator
603
323 8224
focus@focustamworth.org
Club
Motorsports’ Army Corps permit challenged
Freedom of
Information Act request results in request for reconsideration
TAMWORTH
,
NH
, April 24)
This week, Focus:
Tamworth
will file a request for reconsideration of the Department of the Army
Permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, issued to Club
Motorsports Inc. by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in August 2005. The
reconsideration request is based on the belief that Corps officials
failed to adopt the recommendations of a sound expert hired by the Corps
to advise on the noise impact of the proposed racetrack development on
Mt.
Whittier
in
Tamworth
.
Using the Freedom of Information Act, Focus:
Tamworth
has obtained a copy of the report that the Corps sound expert produced.
That report advised the Corps to impose strong limitations on permitted
noise from the proposed racetrack. But the Corps failed to adopt those
standards, and instead accepted the significantly higher noise limits
proposed by the applicant.
By Federal statute, the Corps is charged with
evaluating a broad range of community impacts for significant projects
like the Club Motorsports proposal.
During the Corps’ 18-month consideration of
the permit, it invited public comment on the project and held a public
hearing in
Tamworth
. Noise was a major concern both for speakers at the hearing and in
written comments submitted to the Corps.
Two professional noise studies of the track’s
impact, one commissioned by the Tamworth Foundation and one by Club
Motorsports, were also submitted to the Corps. The Tamworth Foundation
study, performed by Harris, Miller, Miller and Hanson (HMMH), indicated
that the noise from the proposed track would have significant adverse
effects on the town; the Club Motorsports study, by Tech Environmental
(TE), indicated no major impact.
During its consideration of the permit, the
Corps hired a third expert, James Cowan of Acentech in Cambridge, MA, to
evaluate the two conflicting studies and make recommendations for
conditions to be attached to the permit.
Cowan’s report was highly critical of the TE
study. He noted that the Traffic Noise Model used by TE was “not
appropriate or adequate for modeling racetrack noise,” and that the
criteria on which TE evaluated noise impacts were “not intended for
use in the analysis of racetrack noise.”
Cowan recommended that the Corps set a noise
limit of 89dBA, measured 50 ft from trackside. This is the limit
currently in place at
Connecticut
’s
Lime
Rock
Park
, a facility that CMI officials have cited as similar to their proposed
track. It is also the trackside noise limit that was recommended by HMMH
as one of the noise limitations for the original draft of the Tamworth
Race Track Ordinance. That limitation standard was challenged by CMI.
Cowan noted that as proposed, the CMI project
will generate noise levels of 100dBA at 50 ft, more than twice as loud
as Lime Rock. He also noted that the Lime Rock site is relatively flat.
The proposed CMI site is on the side of a steep hill, with a granite
ledge that will reflect noise back toward the town.
“The frequency content and the duration of
noise events that could be caused by this facility will sound like no
other sound sources in the area. Without appropriate limits, this will
change the environment of the
Tamworth
area,” Cowan’s report concludes.
“When the Corps granted Club Motorsports’
permit and accepted the noise standards proposed by the applicant, we
were concerned. When we saw the Acentech report itself, we felt that we
had to ask the Corps to reconsider its decision,” said Focus:
Tamworth
spokesperson Charles Greenhalgh.
The reconsideration request will be directed to
Army Corps Attorney Michael Hicks. “If the request for reconsideration
is not successful, the next level of appeal would be to the
U.S. Federal District Court
,” Greenhalgh said. “We understand that process could take more than
a year.”
Focus: Tamworth is a coalition of local
residents who support careful and fair regulations that protect
Tamworth
’s economic and natural resources. More information on Focus:
Tamworth
is available at www.focustamworth.org.
-end-
Note
to editors: a copy of the FOIA response, containing James Cowan’s
recommendations to the Army Corps, is available from Focus:
Tamworth
or at www.focustamworth.org/Acentech_report_FOIA.pdf
|